Ice Miller


45 attorneys named to The Best Lawyers in America 2007 list


13 attorneys named Leading Lawyers in Chambers USA - 2006 The Client's Guide


Recognized as top-ranked law firm in the State of Indiana in the areas of Corporate Transactions/Mergers & Acquisitions, Employment (mainly defendant) and Real Estate by Chambers USA- 2006


Ranked 30th out of the top 100 firms in the nation for diversity*


Ranked 34th out of the top 100 firms in the nation for partner diversity*


Ranked 7th out of the top 50 firms in the nation for women*

Ranked 15th in the top 25 firms for disabled Americans*

*according to MultiCultural Law Magazine

Ranked 17th largest healthcare firm in the nation as of January 12, 2007**

 

**according to the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA)

Healthcare Alert - March 26, 2007

   

Radiology Technologists Do Not Qualify for
Professional Exemption

On February 1, 2007, the Department of Labor issued an opinion letter regarding the qualification of radiology technologists (RTs) for exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) wage and hour laws.  The opinion letter states that RTs DO NOT qualify for the professional exemption and therefore must be paid time and one half for overtime hours.

The FLSA exempts from its minimum wage and overtime pay provisions "any employee employed in a bona fide…professional capacity."  The exemption is not determined by the job title or employment classification, but rather the duties and salary of the individual employee. 

In the opinion letter the Department states, "We do not believe that the RT position meets the primary duty requirement … The RT's primary duty does not appear to require 'knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.'  The requirement that an RT complete a two-to-three year radiology technology program accredited by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (or some other manner of accreditation acceptable to the ARRT), along with an ARRT examination for registration, does not appear to meet this regulatory standard."

Thus, the Department concludes that RTs do not qualify for the "learned professional" exemption and must be paid minimum wage and overtime as required by the FLSA.

While these opinion letters do not have the force of law, they are good guidance for you to determine how the Department would view this issue if an audit were conducted.

If you would like further information or a copy of the full text of the Department's opinion letter, please contact Kevin C. Woodhouse (kevin.woodhouse@icemiller.com) or Paul Sinclair (paul.sinclair@icemiller.com).

This publication is intended for general information purposes only and does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice.  The reader must consult with legal counsel to determine how laws or decisions discussed herein apply to the reader's specific circumstances.

Copyright (c) 2007 Ice Miller LLP and its licensors. All rights reserved.