Indiana Supreme
Court Weighs In On Workplace "Bullying"
In a decision announced April 8, 2008, the Indiana Supreme Court weighed in
on workplace bullying in a highly publicized case involving a local physician accused
of such conduct. In reversing the
Indiana Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court affirmed a $325,000 jury verdict in
favor of an employee who claimed he suffered bullying in the workplace. Although the facts of this case arose out of
the often-tense environment of a hospital operating room, this decision by the
Indiana Supreme Court may have significant ramifications for all Indiana
employers.
The
Articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Time
Magazine, for example, reflect the growing concern of corporations across
the country about the impact of these types of behaviors on employee morale,
productivity, and attrition. Bullying is
generally known as “the tendency of
individuals or groups to use persistent aggressive or unreasonable behavior
against a co-worker.” In addition to
cases like the one recently decided by the Indiana Supreme Court, 13 states
have considered or currently are considering statutes concerning potential liability
for workplace bullying.
This trend is not limited to the United States. Recently, a British court upheld a record $26
million dollar verdict in an extreme case of "mobbing" of an employee
by a supervisor.
Ice Miller will be hosting a
webinar to discuss the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision and to help
employers understand their options for dealing with workplace bullying on
Friday, April 18, from noon- 1 p.m. (EST).
Register
online for this free webinar.
David Carr is a partner in Ice Miller's Labor & Employment Practice Group. His practice focuses in the areas of personnel policies, employment discrimination, sports law, and employment contracts involving trade secrets, confidential information and covenants against competition.
This publication is intended for general information purposes only and does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. The reader must consult with legal counsel to determine how laws or decisions discussed herein apply to the reader's specific circumstances.